With all this “politicking” from aspiring candidates who have now (slightly) started their campaign for the 2010 election, a “planned” Automated Election shouldn’t be left behind
An editorial from Manila Times entitled Open Election System (OES) in 2010 stated the sentiment of CBCP regarding the automated election in 2010. This because Comelec had proposed to the senators that it will be using the so-called Precinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS) instead of DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) and OMR (Optical Mark Reader) which helped the ARMM vote-counting to be successful. However, CBCP expressed their concern that “these technologies seem to be very costly in terms of procurement and storage and do not exactly guarantee fraud-free election results.” It endorsed the so-called Open Election System (OES).” (investing.businessweek.com).
While it’s quite technical how PCOS, DRE and OMR operate, Comelec argued that PCOS is much better because it is an improved OMR. “PCOS involves the use of machines reading or scanning optical paper ballots that voters have marked by hand. The votes shown in each scanned ballot are then automatically added in a computerized tally for every “clustered precinct.” Under this system, precincts would have to be clustered, otherwise there would have to be hundreds of thousands of precincts to be equipped with PCOS machines. With clutering, only 80,000 PCOS machines need to be deployed throughout the Philippines” (investing.businessweek.com).
I bet it’s too technical.
Actually, there are a number of issues, news and debate going on in the internet as to whether the government will pursue this automated election next year or would rather turn for a long and sure preparation of the plan. In a news published on the internet, one analyst warned that rushing for an automated election may result to security problems as well as failure in registration of vote casts, crediting votes to candidates and may even be prone to hacking. This analyst seemed to be quite cautious of vote counting in fear that we maybe paralleled to USA where in some states like California and Maryland resorted to the conventional-type of voting – used of pen and paper. While another news released this month said that Comelec Chairman Jose Armando Melo has urged the Congress to approved the bill granting some P11.3 billion for the 2010 May election and convinced that the budget should be release by April this year. Actually, I got confused with those news about the supplemental budget for the next year’s election – other news article said that the budget was approve this year while others wrote that the bill is still for a review and subject for approval. Well then, you should decide!
Anyway, I’ll just end this query with a doubt: With P11.3 billion “approved” supplemental budget for the automated 2010 election, I hope that President Arroyo could live up to one of her plans under the Medium-Term Development, which emphasize electoral reforms by pursuing an automated elections that is said to be ‘essential to political stability.